After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures throughout Europe, fresh technologies have become reviving these systems. Out of lie detection tools tested at the border to a system for verifying documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of systems is being made use of in asylum applications. This article explores just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with capricious tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs all their capacity to find their way these systems and to go after their legal right for safeguard.

It also demonstrates how these kinds of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering all of them from getting at the programs of safeguard. It further argues that analyses of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in the disciplinary www.ascella-llc.com/counseling-services-for-students mechanisms these technologies, in which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects whom are regimented by their reliability on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article argues that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double result: while they assist to expedite the asylum procedure, they also make it difficult with regards to refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.